When documenting injuries, which term is most appropriate for a case that involves no personal injury?

The term "Property Only" is the most appropriate choice when documenting injuries in a case where there is no personal injury involved. This terminology clearly indicates that the incident in question has only caused damage to property and that no individuals have sustained any harm. It succinctly communicates the nature of the incident, which is crucial for accurate record-keeping and further action.

Using this terminology helps ensure that anyone reviewing the report understands the scope of the incident without confusion. It allows law enforcement and other stakeholders to categorize cases appropriately and can impact how the situation is addressed, including insurance claims or further investigations.

Other phrases, while potentially conveyable in casual conversation, do not efficiently provide the necessary clarity. Phrases like "No Hurt" or "No Injury Reported" are less formal and could lead to ambiguity about the specifics of the incident. "Property Damage" might suggest that there is some kind of harm inflicted on property only, but it may not emphasize the absence of personal injury as clearly as "Property Only." Therefore, "Property Only" effectively encapsulates the situation where no personal harm has occurred.